To register for this event, please login or create your visitor account.

Thursday
26 March
2026
10:30 to 12:30
IN PERSON
BY REQUEST
Thursday 26 March 2026
10:30 to 12:30

Presentation

Where there is no clear consensus among arbitrators and frequent disagreements between opposing experts there can be substantial impact on damages awards. This panel will explore three of the biggest open questions affecting quantum in international arbitration.

These areas include:

1. Choice of valuation methodology. Particularly for early-stage, capital-heavy development projects when is it appropriate to use a lost-profit (DCF, market, etc…) versus a sunk-cost approach. What criteria and thresholds have tribunals used previously?

2. Comparables. Past transactions versus public valuations. When is a transaction or company considered comparable? How do experts define peer-group comparables? When do past transactions on the same asset qualify as comparable? How relevant are past bids for the same asset?

3. Calculation of interest. Choosing between ‘risk-free’, “commercial” (e.g. SOFR+), cost of equity / WACC. Compensatory versus punitive character of (particularly post-award) interest. Decisions on interest in claims that were brought with significant delays or stayed for a long time. Pre-award interest and post-award interest.

The discussion will be concluded with a Q&A segment, with guests invited to continue the conversation with the panel and other delegates over lunch.

Host Speakers

Daniela BAMBACI
Managing Director
BRG
Michael SEELHOF
Managing Director
BRG

Guest Speakers

Rahim MOLOO
Partner and Co-Chair of International Arbitration
Gibson Dunn
José Manuel GARCíA REPRESA
Founding Partner
Wordstone Dispute Resolution AARPI
Ruth STACKPOOL-MOORE
Portfolio Manager - Asia & International Arbitration
Omni Bridgeway

Cocktail

12:30 - 13:30
Guests are welcome to continue the discussion over lunch.

Venue

Maison de l'Alsace
39 Avenue des Champs-Élysées
75008 Paris

Registration for this event is now closed.