To register for this event, please login or create your visitor account.

Wednesday 9 April 2025
14:30 to 16:00
Please register before:
Tuesday 1 April
Share:
Add to my favourites

Wednesday 9 April 2025
14:30 to 16:00
Please register before:
Tuesday 1 April
Share:
Add to my favourites

IN PERSON OPEN IN PERSON OPEN #Commercial arbitration #Europe


Presentation

Everyone seems to like sandwiches but hardly anyone likes to be sandwiched in a dispute. Still, there are many situations in which being sandwiched is the ill fate of a contractual party.

Think of a contractor who faces claims from the owner and at the same time has own claims against its subcontractor relating to the same works. This contractor will be involved in two separate arbitration proceedings with the inherent risk of losing both. The owner may establish claims against the contractor in the first arbitration for defective works but the arbitrators in the second arbitration may not consider the works done by the subcontractor as defective. Effectively, the contractor is sandwiched.

In litigation, a third-party notice, an impleader or a vouching-in could help to bind the subcontractor to the outcome of the dispute between the owner and the contractor without making the subcontractor a party to these proceedings. In arbitration, things are not that straightforward and parties seeking to mirror the litigation rules in their arbitration agreement face an uphill battle. Owner, contractor and subcontractor often do not sit at the same negotiation table. Spending time on drafting a complex arbitration agreement may likewise not be such a brilliant idea when other commercial issues are more pressing. To help parties in such a situation, the DIS has conceived a set of new rules, the DIS Supplementary Rules for Third-Party Notices, which entered into force on 15 March 2024 (the “DIS Supplementary Rules”).

Over sandwiches, we will discuss how these new rules can help parties prevent being sandwiched in arbitration, in what situations being sandwiched is a real risk and what in your experiences are ways to handle such situations. Can arbitration institutions remedy this perceived disadvantage of arbitration against litigation? Are the new DIS Supplementary Rules a model suitable for international arbitration?

Co-Organized by AFA-DIS Arbitration Group

German Arbitration Institute (DIS)
Deutsche Institution für Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit e.V.
www.disarb.org

Host Speakers

Jan SCHAEFER
Partner
King & Spalding
Reinmar WOLFF
Vice President/Ass. Prof.
DIS/University of Marburg

Guest Speakers

Vanessa BENICHOU
Lawyer/Partner
King & Spalding International LLP
David QUINKE
Partner
Marc HENRY
President
AFA
Judith SAWANG
Partner
Ashurst LLP
Karl HENNESSEE
Senior Vice-President at Airbus and Non Executive Board Member at Carmat
Airbus
Marina WEISS
Partner
Bredin Prat
Vanessa FONCKE
Partner
Jones Day

Venue

48 bis Rue de Monceau
King & Spalding LLP
75008 Paris
Sign In Calendar